image
image
image


History of the Park District

The following history is provided courtesy of Pat Aldrich, Centerville-Washington Township Historical Society

Setting the Stage

As housing development moved south in Montgomery County, the residents of Washington Township realized that there were no zoning laws in place and they found themselves in a position to not only control the development but shape the township as they wanted.

The Village of Centerville covered 2 1/2 square miles in the early 1950s. The unincorporated part of Washington Township, which covered 30 square miles, was 90% farm land. That open space included beautiful countryside, many natural wooded areas and a network of creeks and streams. In 1952, Montgomery County brought the public water line into the township, making the area ready for development, both housing and commercial. The residents were very worried that the developers would buy entire farms and cut the acreage into small lots. There were no township zoning controls nor plans for development. And there were no plans to leave open space or create parks.

A Committee of 100, led by resident Bill Yeck, was formed to promote the adoption of the Montgomery County zoning regulations. In May 1953, the first zoning law was set in place and solved the initial concern. But the county zoning laws were more permissive and allowed the subdivision of land into 50-foot lots which was smaller than the township people envisioned. The residents were also concerned about the development of trailer courts, heavy industry, and commercial development. By researching the law, the committee learned that they could design their own zoning plan which would then be approved by the voters.

A Zoning Commission was created with William Newill, chairman, Ethel Winterhalter, secretary, Mars Nafe, Dale Martin, Robert Easton, and Bill Yeck, who was asked to form a committee and draft a resolution. Bill and his committee did extensive research and then drafted the zoning resolution using ideas from other suburban communities with low-density occupancy, and some of the latest concepts of development. It was unique in Montgomery County. It called for...
  • minimum lot sizes of one-half acre
  • requirements for parks within a half mile of every home
  • landscaped buffer strips around tree-shaded parking lots
  • strict limitations on the size of business signs
  • the elimination of billboards
This new and innovative resolution became public in the spring of 1956 and the job of creating a unique community began. The Montgomery County Builders Association attacked the plan, the Montgomery County Planning Commission opposed the resolution, a Dayton Daily News editorial said that one-half acre lots was an unreasonably strict limitation, and a group of residents against the resolution formed the Washington Township Homeowners. Residents in favor of the plan formed the Committee of 500 which grew to the Committee of 1000. The Kettering-Oakwood Times supported the plan and told the residents "Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes." In the February 7, 1957 election 1,184 residents voted for the proposal and 651 voted against.

A Park District

Parks of all different sorts were just what a family-oriented, open space-minded community needed. A Park District was formed but Ohio law allowed only one park per township. It was up to the residents to get the law changed.

About this same time, Sherwood Snyder, who, with his brother, Chester, ran the popular Wishing Well Restaurant on West Franklin Street, returned from a trip to Europe anxious for Centerville and Washington Township to have the kinds of parks he visited on his vacation. He sold his idea to the community and then spearheaded a township-wide campaign to raise money to purchase land for a park. They raised $24,300 and bought 20 acres for the Activity Center. This successful undertaking demonstrated that a park was a great and necessary thing for the community, but it also proved that the community worked well together.

Sherwood Snyder and Bill Yeck often talked about open space. For Bill Yeck, the Activity Center was a great idea for the present but it would not support the kids and families from all the new neighborhoods yet to be developed, nor would it save the forests and streams that were so important to the residents. It inspired, however, an investigation into the formation of a park district, which could not only reserve land for a system of parks, but preserve the natural areas as well.

In 1957, the Resolution Committee of the Zoning Commission moved its focus to parks and formed the Plan Association of Washington Township. Bill Yeck, Bill Newill, Dale Martin, Mars Nafe, Bob Easton, and Myron George sat down to study future development of the township, and in particular, an extensive program for parks. They observed that some of the surrounding communities had not provided adequate parks and playgrounds for their citizens, and that this was because they had not set up a park commission early enough to reserve the land. They felt that the key to success was planning and the time was right for Washington Township.

They pressed forward despite the fact that in 1956 an investigation into park district law found that the all townships were limited to only one park.

In 1958, the Plan Association recommended to the township trustees, Galen Wilson, Mars Nafe, and Russell Watkins that they lead a drive to establish a park district. The trustees asked James M. Boyle and the Activity Center members to submit a petition for a park district. Charles P. Burkhart, James M. Boyle and Arthur E. Moyer accepted an appointment by the Common Pleas Court as park commissioners. Arthur E. Moyer's job soon transferred him to Europe for two years and in September, 1959 Bill Yeck replaced him on the board.

In 1959, the Trustees put the issue of a park district on the November 3 ballot and the people voted to create the Washington Township Park District. It was a yes or no vote "For Free Public Park" and did not involve a tax levy. It passed with 1,390 votes for and 660 votes against.

And in November 1960, after a 733 to 466 defeat in May of that year, a one-half mill park levy was passed by the voters. It was a three year levy giving the Park District $18,761.95 the first year to conduct business. The levy would enable them to purchase some of the sites needed and some basic plantings, but nothing for equipment or construction. The commissioners needed to find a better way to create the parks that the community had voted for.
Density Zoning

Something new had to be put in place to accomplish their vision and the Open Space Committee came up with an original idea.

Bill Yeck suggested forming an Open Space Committee to coordinate reserving, purchasing and developing land for parks and playgrounds with the schools, government officials, businesses and highway planners. For example, sharing land with schools might ease the need for playgrounds, and then the school system and the Park District could share both the use and the maintenance costs. The first meeting was held on January 12, 1961 and present were Bill Yeck, Robert Tamaska, from the Centerville Council, O.H.P. Snyder, from the Board of Education, Hadley Watts, Executive Head of Washington Township Schools, William Malone, the Kettering Planning Director, Robert Clark, Executive Director of the Montgomery County Planning Commission, Dale Martin, from the Township Zoning Commission, Mars Nafe, township trustee, and Thomas Gordon, from the Centerville Planning Commission and Council.

The committee took their vision and set it down in the form of a map of the township showing 30 possible locations of neighborhood parks, playgrounds, and schools that would provide a basis for the Park District to reserve open space. The map also proposed locations for two other kinds of parks that the committee felt were needed in the community: large community parks to serve the people's active recreation needs and nature parks to preserve the rough terrain and wooded areas along Holes Creek and Sugar Creek.

But a better approach for the Park District to reserve land for parks was still needed. After further research and using new ideas from across the country, commissioners Bill Yeck, Jim Boyle, and Charles Burkhart came up with an original, untested plan under Ohio park district law, to reserve land for parks. The plan came to be known as "density zoning."

Density zoning allowed the developers to shave off a little bit of land from each lot and put it in a common spot in the middle of the development. This would create an open space with a playground while keeping the same number of lots in that neighborhood. And if, because of size, location or terrain, a lot was not available, funds could be substituted to acquire a lot outside the plat, but close enough to serve the residents of the neighborhood. Density zoning was also the key to the economical development of the Park District because funds would go into the development of the parks instead of the purchasing of land for the parks. The leading Dayton engineering firm thought it would work and the lawyers said go ahead and try it.

Density zoning required Centerville and Washington Township to change their zoning laws to allow developers to reduce their lot sizes. In 1961, village mayor William O. Gimbel, the council, and the village planning board approved the amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow density zoning. The township trustees would not approve the amendment for four years.

The next task to be undertaken was to deal with the law that allowed only one park for townships. The law needed to be changed. The park commissioners talked to State Senator Charles W. Whalen and State Representative Clara Weisenborn who then led the effort in Columbus by talking to the Ohio Legislature. In 1963, the Ohio law was changed to allow as many parks as a community wanted. Over the years, the park commissioners went to Columbus whenever it was necessary to change legislation which negatively affected parks.
Against the Tide of Controversy

Like all new concepts, density zoning had to be put to the test. Did it work in the real world?

The Park District commissioners adopted the operating name of Centerville-Washington Park District in 1962. They began their work, as they waited for the township to approve the amendment and the Ohio park law issue to be resolved. They recognized the need for fields for sports, maybe a golf course, and woodland areas, but felt that the immediate need was for parks and playgrounds. Their first order of business was to establish parks in the neighborhoods with the most concentration of homes. Those areas were,
  • Mark-Dale site in the Mad River Estates development at the northeast section of Mad River and Whipp Roads
  • Concept site in the southeast section of Centerville
  • Washington Park site in the northeast section of Centerville
  • Southbrook site, south of proposed intersection of Rosa Linda Dr. and Southbrook Dr.
A public debate arose and was centered in the township with the Mark-Dale site as the Park District embarked on its efforts to accomplish the mandate that the people gave them in 1959. The Park District wanted to purchase 4 1/2 acres between Jennie Lane and Mark-Dale Drive, but the owners of the land did not want to sell the land for a park. The Commissioners instituted condemnation proceedings against the owners. Bill Yeck said they would like to hold off, but were obliged to the people of Washington Township to develop a park there.

The nearby residents weren't so sure they wanted the park either. They thought the property was too expensive for a playground and also thought the park would lower the value of the near-by properties. They imagined large crowds of people coming from Dayton bringing with them noise and uproar, rather than a quiet playground for the neighborhood kids. And they questioned the legality of the park commissioner's actions.

A public hearing, described by newspapers as evenly divided between "violent opposition and quiet approval," was held by the park commissioners to get the temperament of the residents and to investigate alternatives. Although the park commissioners were open minded and wanted to understand what the objections were, they would not allow defeat of the Park District's purpose.

Bill Yeck put on an elaborate 2-hour slide show presentation of the Park District's plans. "Our main objective is to provide a place for children to play off the streets." He agreed there was some question as to the board's authority under present law but said that the Park District's legal advisor urged continuance of the township's planned park system, feeling the legality question could be solved without difficulty. A pediatrician who was also a resident said he felt qualified to speak for the children of the area, and stated that parents need to think of the future and the value of their children, and not so much of themselves or property values.

Ray Bell, of Ray Bell Realty, represented the land owners and developers and said he was not opposed to parks but felt that the proposed park site was not preplanned, before sewage and roadway plans were drawn and approved, and any park development could cause considerable difficulty through alteration of established engineering plans.

The Park District found another site, four acres south of Druewood Lane, that would not front on either street of the first site. It had a natural buffer zone of trees between the play area and the homes on Mark-Dale. The second site was accepted by the residents, but not the land owners. Condemnation proceedings began for the second site. The controversy would continue until 1966 with the creation of Old Lane Park.

The development of the other three parks went a bit smoother with Concept Park ending up the first park developed by the Park District. The Concept Development Company offered 5.9 acres at no cost, utilizing the density zoning provision, as an open space transfer.

The Washington Park site became Pleasant Hill Park in 1971 as a purchase using combined money from the Park District and HUD.

The Southbrook site became Green Park in 1988 part by density zoning and part by purchase after being leased for a period of years.


Township Zoning Amendments

"We have an opportunity to establish a great open space community and density zoning is a means to accomplish it."

In 1963, as the Park District looked to future housing development, they listed six parks needed by 1964 and seven by 1968. The money from the 1960 levy was used up and the Park District was out of funds. The park commissioners asked the voters to renew the levy for three more years and they did by a 68% majority. Township Trustees, Ethel Winterhalter, Russell Watkins, and Robert Reed, still hadn't passed the amendments to the zoning laws allowing density zoning and a debate began to grow in intensity. Over the next couple of years, the pros and cons were voiced in the newspapers and in open meetings held by the park commissioners.

In November, 1963, Township Trustee Ethel Winterhalter expressed her thoughts on the amendments in the Kettering-Oakwood Times. Ethel, a graduate of Ohio State University, owned and farmed 110 acres on Lebanon Pike, south of Centerville. Her parents had purchased the land, which included the old Samuel Broadaway house, in 1914. When they died in 1948, Ethel took over the farm, joined the Grange and became an active resident of the community. She was a township trustee for twelve years. She said she had experienced local government mismanaging the development of the community as it grew and didn't want that to happen to Washington Township. An open space advocate, she believed that development didn't have to be detrimental to the land and wanted to be thorough and cautious with this new amendment. She admired the "homegrown" Activity Center and the volunteers that worked together to create it.

In the article, Ethel said she didn't see a need for a whole series of playgrounds in the township. She felt that playgrounds and playfields should be developed with the schools, which would keep from duplicating services and facilities, and would also keep the noisy playfields away from houses. She felt that the township needed large parks that the whole family could enjoy and that small playgrounds away from home was just a place to "farm kids out." Houses should be built on large enough lots so the kids could play in their own yard. In addition, Ethel objected to the way the park commissioners turned down good park sites, like the one by Weller school, and also, that they used the park levy money to bring condemnation action at the Mark-Dale Rd. site.

Other concerns voiced by residents and officials were:
  • the township should have a comprehensive land-use master plan and all amendments should be held until that is complete. In a suburban area with open farmland and no development plan, these amendments could only create chaos, distrust, and uncertainty.
  • will density zoning stand up in court?
  • will density zoning be an incentive for developers to slice off some for a park and then try to rezone creating even smaller lots?
  • who would decide how much money should be paid by the developer so the Park District could acquire an equivalent lot for a park?
  • will these amendments open the township up to "graft" if one person or a small group of persons holds the power to decide how much money the township can accept from a builder?
  • if township trustees rezone the land do they have the power to give this money to the Park District for the purchase of park land since park commissioners and trustees are not connected or responsible to each other?
  • should so much power be in the hands of just a few?
  • will smaller sized homes encourage development of cheaper homes?
  • maintaining all these parks will continually cost more and more money.
  • why do we need to worry, this land will always be farm land?

The park commissioners organized many public meetings to answer questions, resolve concerns and fears, and iron out the issues that were raised. They were intent on trying to find a path between the builders who prefer small lots and more houses, and the citizens who oppose plat development altogether.

Bill Yeck said that there was a time, not too many years ago, when he stood up and argued for zoning that required large lots. He felt that half-acre lots was the way to insure "gracious country living." He said he had changed his mind, although the goal is the same. "Conditions have changed, we are going through a period of compromise. There are still places for large estate-sized lots, but there are areas that are going to be developed without any appreciable green space."

He explained that the purpose of the amendments was to encourage improved use of land in Washington Township, which included reserving land for open spaces, while providing additional ways to control population density. The township demands for large lot sizes and the restrictive zoning laws tended to encourage builders to get their property annexed into other municipalities where zoning is less stringent. Annexation of more than 2300 acres to Centerville and Kettering was blamed directly on the township's stiff zoning. Density zoning would preserve township zoning principles and the character of the community and keep the township intact.

In his presentations, Bill Yeck said that proper development is always a top priority, where everything is designed to be an asset. The Park District has always advocated coordinating with the schools to share cost and space. He answered that the land next to Weller School was too small and not appropriate for a playground. And he said those opposed to the condemnation proceedings for the the Mark-Dale Rd. site should review the facts. He said that plenty of times the commission thought about taking the easy way out, but that wouldn't have given the kids a place to play.

The park commissioners were committed to the promise of the Park District and knew that this was an issue that all were watching. Centerville and Washington Township were in a position to lead the way and demonstrate how the cooperation of all public officials in a community and the land developers can result in a park system that will benefit both community and developer, and at minimum investment by all groups. "We have an opportunity to establish a great open space community and density zoning is a means to accomplish it."

Builder Joseph Rengers said he was for the amendments as a developer. He said the concept of density zoning fit in with homeowners' and prospective buyer's approach to land.

Dale Bertsch of the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission responded to the concern about a master plan and said yes, the township did need one, but they have to start somewhere and this is the place. Open space does not wait.

Centerville resident Erma Bombeck, wrote about the issue in "Zone 59," a column she wrote for the Kettering-Oakwood Times. In the May 7, 1964 issue she said, "If you've never shaken hands with a challenge before, it might inspire you to shake hands with Mr. Yeck, Mr. Burkhart and Mr. George who are working to bring a play area within a half mile of every child in Washington Twp."

In August 1964, a committee was formed to officially construct the amendments. The committee included Robert L. Reed, township trustee, Charles Abramovitz, an engineer with the Ralph L. Woolpert Company, Robert Easton, a member of the Township Zoning Commission, and Bill Yeck, chairman of the park commission. In a last public meeting, on February 18, 1965, the amendments were presented along with a detailed slide show, by Bill Yeck, of what the amendments would mean to the township. Most of the group attending were for the amendments. Finally, the trustees indicated that they would pass the amendments, but wanted to put it off to work out some imprecise wording and do a little minor rephrasing.

In a special Saturday morning session on February 20, 1965, township trustees Ethel Winterhalter, Russell Watkins, and Robert Reed approved the new density zoning amendments to the zoning ordinance. The amendments allowed the density zoning provision that would permit developers of single-family units to reduce lot sizes and transfer the accumulated space to a public park area. They also allowed a variety of development in a project of 20 acres or more while utilizing the density zoning provision and would allow the establishment of privately maintained recreation areas under a homeowners' association.

Evelyn List, zoning inspector said that she had been in disagreement with the park commissioners but had a change of heart. She said she was for it now, has put a lot of study into it, and is going to talk to some builders who want to take 41 acres into Kettering. "I want to have something to show them."

B.E. Clark, Montgomery County Planning Director said that the amendments will enable developers to add variety to their projects.

Harold Freiheit, director of Montgomery and Greene Counties Open Space Study Committee, said the results of this plan may be implemented in the whole county. It is a pilot plan that Montgomery County is waiting for, and will pave the way for this type of zoning throughout other townships.

These amendments were full of a promise to make Washington Township a great Open Space Community by allowing new homeowners to set aside school and park sites for their use without cost to present tax payers. It was a good precedent and the Centerville-Washington Park District was on its way. With the vision of the 1950s and with the 30 circles on the original plan map where neighborhoods would be developed and parks needed, it all fell into place.

The rest of the story is told through the individual parks as each one developed, as the Park District kept its promise of 1959 to the residents of Centerville and Washington Township.


The Commissioners, Staff, and Volunteers

Park Commissioners - In the early days before there was a staff, the commissioners had a large role in land acquisition and daily operations. Once the Park District started hiring, less and less duties and responsibilities fell to the commissioners. Today their responsibilities are in setting policy for the Park District and approving and monitoring the budget. And they are active in the levy campaigns. The commissioners are appointed by the Court of Common Pleas and serve 3-year terms, all without pay. Each year one commissioner is up for re-appointment and they have term limits of 9 years.

Bill Yeck, of course, continued to work behind the scenes with land acquisition and the development of parkland. Rev. Harvey Smith was on the board for 23 years, many of them as president. He worked closely with Bill and continues to volunteer work on the levies.

Staff - In the beginning, taking care of the parks was an informal process and there were always volunteers willing and able to work. In 1965, Larry Marker was hired as a temporary park director. Mary Jo Zoller was hired as part-time secretary and worked for the district until 1994. In 1966, as the number of parks grew, Russell Miller was hired as a part-time director and engineer at $2.75 an hour. In 1967, Richard E. Haley, and his tractor, was hired as a part-time maintenance chief. He worked evenings and on weekends and he was paid $2.50 an hour. If he used his chain saw, a $1.50 an hour was added to his pay. If he needed his pickup truck he was paid 10 cents a mile. Gene E. Cronk was hired as a part-time engineer in 1968.

By the early 1970s, it was clear that part-time help and rented equipment could not handle the job. In 1971, Jack W. Whitesell was hired as special projects supervisor. In 1974, 2 chain saws, a pick up truck, 2 tractors and a rotary mower were purchased. In 1975, the Park District built an operations building at the Activity Center. Ed Kramer was hired as a part-time naturalist in 1978 and Brett Ney was added as a mowing supervisor.

In 1975, James A. Schneider was hired as full time park manager/director. He left in 1982 and the Park District was without a director until 1991 when Rick Tittsler was hired. Carol Kennard, who had been program manager since 1982, was hired as the third director in 1998.

In 1974, Robert F. Feldmann was hired as superintendent. Throughout the years, his job evolved as duties were added. In 2008, his title was changed to development manager, which better reflected his responsibilities.

As park development increased, so did the level of care for the parks. The operations department grew to meet the demand, including the addition of a second shift and weekend crew during the busy months.

The Park District had originally supported the concept of youth baseball, football, and soccer leagues operated by citizens organizations without Park District supervision. But in the 1980s things were pushing for a change. Carol Kennard was hired as the first full-time program coordinator in 1982. She initiated a comprehensive programs of sports instruction, tournaments and leagues for youth and adults, summer recreation programs for children, and nature programs in Grant Park and Sugar Valley Park (now Bill Yeck Park).

Over the next several years, many staff contributed to the success of the programs and the program department grew to four full-time staff. Office management became a priority as programs increased. In time a full-charge bookkeeper, communications coordinator, and business manager filled the office staff requirements.

From 1970 to 1994 the building and grounds design was provided by Joseph F. Hirsch, architect and landscape designer.

Volunteers - When Carol Kennard came on staff as program director, she started a volunteer naturalist program which is still going strong today. Those adult volunteers provide nature programs in the parks. Youth volunteers help with Hidden Meadows Day Camp and the Summer Rec Program in the summer and Winter Woods Day Camp in the winter. These are kids that have outgrown the program but aren't quite old enough to work.

The largest volunteer group in the parks is the youth athletic leagues, which are entirely run by volunteers - league administrators, coaches, and the officials. The Park District provides the field space, coordinates schedules and maintains the athletic fields.

Each year the Park Districts works with 10 to 15 Boy Scouts and Girls Scouts who do projects in the parks to earn their Eagle Rank and Gold Awards.

And service projects, like litter sweeps or cutting back honeysuckle from the trails, are done by special request from various groups. The Park District is more than happy to have their help.


image
Centerville-Washington Park District

Search Our Site

Stay Connected
Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
YouTube YouTube

Home | General | Parks | Programs | Wellness | Athletics | Park Plans | Support Your Parks | Forms | Site Map | Contact Us
Centerville-Washington Park District (Washington Township Park District), 221 N. Main Street, Centerville, Ohio 45459
HQ (937) 433-5155, FAX (937) 433-6564, Rainout (937) 433-2524, M-F Evenings & Weekends (937) 470-9246