History of the Park District
The following history is provided courtesy of Pat Aldrich, Centerville-Washington Township Historical Society
Setting the Stage
As housing
development moved south in Montgomery County, the residents of Washington
Township realized that there were no zoning laws in place and they found
themselves in a position to not only control the development but shape the
township as they wanted.
The Village of Centerville covered 2 1/2
square miles in the early 1950s. The unincorporated part of Washington
Township, which covered 30 square miles, was 90% farm land. That open space
included beautiful countryside, many natural wooded areas and a network of
creeks and streams. In 1952, Montgomery County brought the public water line
into the township, making the area ready for development, both housing and
commercial. The residents were very worried that the developers would buy
entire farms and cut the acreage into small lots. There were no township
zoning controls nor plans for development. And there were no plans to leave
open space or create parks.
A Committee of 100, led by resident
Bill Yeck, was formed to promote the adoption of the Montgomery County
zoning regulations. In May 1953, the first zoning law was set in place and
solved the initial concern. But the county zoning laws were more permissive
and allowed the subdivision of land into 50-foot lots which was smaller than
the township people envisioned. The residents were also concerned about the
development of trailer courts, heavy industry, and commercial development.
By researching the law, the committee learned that they could design their
own zoning plan which would then be approved by the voters.
A Zoning
Commission was created with William Newill, chairman, Ethel Winterhalter,
secretary, Mars Nafe, Dale Martin, Robert Easton, and Bill Yeck, who was
asked to form a committee and draft a resolution. Bill and his committee did
extensive research and then drafted the zoning resolution using ideas from
other suburban communities with low-density occupancy, and some of the
latest concepts of development. It was unique in Montgomery County. It
called for...
- minimum lot sizes of one-half acre
- requirements for parks within a half mile of every home
- landscaped buffer strips around tree-shaded parking lots
- strict limitations on the size of business signs
- the elimination of billboards
This new and innovative resolution became public in the spring of 1956 and
the job of creating a unique community began. The Montgomery County Builders
Association attacked the plan, the Montgomery County Planning Commission
opposed the resolution, a Dayton Daily News editorial said that one-half
acre lots was an unreasonably strict limitation, and a group of residents
against the resolution formed the Washington Township Homeowners. Residents
in favor of the plan formed the Committee of 500 which grew to the Committee
of 1000. The Kettering-Oakwood Times supported the plan and told the
residents "Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes." In the February 7, 1957
election 1,184 residents voted for the proposal and 651 voted against.
A Park District
Parks of all different
sorts were just what a family-oriented, open space-minded community needed.
A Park District was formed but Ohio law allowed only one park per township.
It was up to the residents to get the law changed.
About this same
time, Sherwood Snyder, who, with his brother, Chester, ran the popular
Wishing Well Restaurant on West Franklin Street, returned from a trip to
Europe anxious for Centerville and Washington Township to have the kinds of
parks he visited on his vacation. He sold his idea to the community and then
spearheaded a township-wide campaign to raise money to purchase land for a
park. They raised $24,300 and bought 20 acres for the Activity Center. This
successful undertaking demonstrated that a park was a great and necessary
thing for the community, but it also proved that the community worked well
together.
Sherwood Snyder and Bill Yeck often talked about open
space. For Bill Yeck, the Activity Center was a great idea for the present
but it would not support the kids and families from all the new
neighborhoods yet to be developed, nor would it save the forests and streams
that were so important to the residents. It inspired, however, an
investigation into the formation of a park district, which could not only
reserve land for a system of parks, but preserve the natural areas as well.
In 1957, the Resolution Committee of the Zoning Commission moved its
focus to parks and formed the Plan Association of Washington Township. Bill
Yeck, Bill Newill, Dale Martin, Mars Nafe, Bob Easton, and Myron George sat
down to study future development of the township, and in particular, an
extensive program for parks. They observed that some of the surrounding
communities had not provided adequate parks and playgrounds for their
citizens, and that this was because they had not set up a park commission
early enough to reserve the land. They felt that the key to success was
planning and the time was right for Washington Township.
They
pressed forward despite the fact that in 1956 an investigation into park
district law found that the all townships were limited to only one park.
In 1958, the Plan Association recommended to the township trustees,
Galen Wilson, Mars Nafe, and Russell Watkins that they lead a drive to
establish a park district. The trustees asked James M. Boyle and the
Activity Center members to submit a petition for a park district. Charles P.
Burkhart, James M. Boyle and Arthur E. Moyer accepted an appointment by the
Common Pleas Court as park commissioners. Arthur E. Moyer's job soon
transferred him to Europe for two years and in September, 1959 Bill Yeck
replaced him on the board.
In 1959, the Trustees put the issue of a
park district on the November 3 ballot and the people voted to create the
Washington Township Park District. It was a yes or no vote "For Free Public
Park" and did not involve a tax levy. It passed with 1,390 votes for and 660
votes against.
And in November 1960, after a 733 to 466 defeat in May
of that year, a one-half mill park levy was passed by the voters. It was a
three year levy giving the Park District $18,761.95 the first year to
conduct business. The levy would enable them to purchase some of the sites
needed and some basic plantings, but nothing for equipment or construction.
The commissioners needed to find a better way to create the parks that the
community had voted for.
Density Zoning
Something new had to be
put in place to accomplish their vision and the Open Space Committee came up
with an original idea.
Bill Yeck suggested forming an Open Space
Committee to coordinate reserving, purchasing and developing land for parks
and playgrounds with the schools, government officials, businesses and
highway planners. For example, sharing land with schools might ease the need
for playgrounds, and then the school system and the Park District could
share both the use and the maintenance costs. The first meeting was held on
January 12, 1961 and present were Bill Yeck, Robert Tamaska, from the
Centerville Council, O.H.P. Snyder, from the Board of Education, Hadley
Watts, Executive Head of Washington Township Schools, William Malone, the
Kettering Planning Director, Robert Clark, Executive Director of the
Montgomery County Planning Commission, Dale Martin, from the Township Zoning
Commission, Mars Nafe, township trustee, and Thomas Gordon, from the
Centerville Planning Commission and Council.
The committee took
their vision and set it down in the form of a map of the township showing 30
possible locations of neighborhood parks, playgrounds, and schools that
would provide a basis for the Park District to reserve open space. The map
also proposed locations for two other kinds of parks that the committee felt
were needed in the community: large community parks to serve the people's
active recreation needs and nature parks to preserve the rough terrain and
wooded areas along Holes Creek and Sugar Creek.
But a better approach
for the Park District to reserve land for parks was still needed. After
further research and using new ideas from across the country, commissioners
Bill Yeck, Jim Boyle, and Charles Burkhart came up with an original,
untested plan under Ohio park district law, to reserve land for parks. The
plan came to be known as "density zoning."
Density zoning allowed the
developers to shave off a little bit of land from each lot and put it in a
common spot in the middle of the development. This would create an open
space with a playground while keeping the same number of lots in that
neighborhood. And if, because of size, location or terrain, a lot was not
available, funds could be substituted to acquire a lot outside the plat, but
close enough to serve the residents of the neighborhood. Density zoning was
also the key to the economical development of the Park District because
funds would go into the development of the parks instead of the purchasing
of land for the parks. The leading Dayton engineering firm thought it would
work and the lawyers said go ahead and try it.
Density zoning
required Centerville and Washington Township to change their zoning laws to
allow developers to reduce their lot sizes. In 1961, village mayor William
O. Gimbel, the council, and the village planning board approved the
amendment to the zoning ordinance to allow density zoning. The township
trustees would not approve the amendment for four years.
The next
task to be undertaken was to deal with the law that allowed only one park
for townships. The law needed to be changed. The park commissioners talked
to State Senator Charles W. Whalen and State Representative Clara Weisenborn
who then led the effort in Columbus by talking to the Ohio Legislature. In
1963, the Ohio law was changed to allow as many parks as a community wanted.
Over the years, the park commissioners went to Columbus whenever it was
necessary to change legislation which negatively affected parks.
Against the Tide of Controversy
Like
all new concepts, density zoning had to be put to the test. Did it work in
the real world?
The Park District commissioners adopted the operating
name of Centerville-Washington Park District in 1962. They began their work,
as they waited for the township to approve the amendment and the Ohio park
law issue to be resolved. They recognized the need for fields for sports,
maybe a golf course, and woodland areas, but felt that the immediate need
was for parks and playgrounds. Their first order of business was to
establish parks in the neighborhoods with the most concentration of homes.
Those areas were,
- Mark-Dale site in the Mad River Estates development at the northeast
section of Mad River and Whipp Roads
- Concept site in the southeast section of Centerville
- Washington Park site in the northeast section of Centerville
- Southbrook site, south of proposed intersection of Rosa Linda Dr.
and Southbrook Dr.
A public debate arose and was centered in the township with the Mark-Dale
site as the Park District embarked on its efforts to accomplish the mandate
that the people gave them in 1959. The Park District wanted to purchase 4
1/2 acres between Jennie Lane and Mark-Dale Drive, but the owners of the
land did not want to sell the land for a park. The Commissioners instituted
condemnation proceedings against the owners. Bill Yeck said they would like
to hold off, but were obliged to the people of Washington Township to
develop a park there.
The nearby residents weren't so sure they
wanted the park either. They thought the property was too expensive for a
playground and also thought the park would lower the value of the near-by
properties. They imagined large crowds of people coming from Dayton bringing
with them noise and uproar, rather than a quiet playground for the
neighborhood kids. And they questioned the legality of the park
commissioner's actions.
A public hearing, described by newspapers as
evenly divided between "violent opposition and quiet approval," was held by
the park commissioners to get the temperament of the residents and to
investigate alternatives. Although the park commissioners were open minded
and wanted to understand what the objections were, they would not allow
defeat of the Park District's purpose.
Bill Yeck put on an elaborate
2-hour slide show presentation of the Park District's plans. "Our main
objective is to provide a place for children to play off the streets." He
agreed there was some question as to the board's authority under present law
but said that the Park District's legal advisor urged continuance of the
township's planned park system, feeling the legality question could be
solved without difficulty. A pediatrician who was also a resident said he
felt qualified to speak for the children of the area, and stated that
parents need to think of the future and the value of their children, and not
so much of themselves or property values.
Ray Bell, of Ray Bell
Realty, represented the land owners and developers and said he was not
opposed to parks but felt that the proposed park site was not preplanned,
before sewage and roadway plans were drawn and approved, and any park
development could cause considerable difficulty through alteration of
established engineering plans.
The Park District found another site,
four acres south of Druewood Lane, that would not front on either street of
the first site. It had a natural buffer zone of trees between the play area
and the homes on Mark-Dale. The second site was accepted by the residents,
but not the land owners. Condemnation proceedings began for the second site.
The controversy would continue until 1966 with the creation of Old Lane
Park.
The development of the other three parks went a bit smoother
with Concept Park ending up the first park developed by the Park District.
The Concept Development Company offered 5.9 acres at no cost, utilizing the
density zoning provision, as an open space transfer.
The Washington
Park site became Pleasant Hill Park in 1971 as a purchase using combined
money from the Park District and HUD.
The Southbrook site became
Green Park in 1988 part by density zoning and part by purchase after being
leased for a period of years.
Township Zoning Amendments
"We have
an opportunity to establish a great open space community and density zoning
is a means to accomplish it."
In 1963, as the Park District looked
to future housing development, they listed six parks needed by 1964 and
seven by 1968. The money from the 1960 levy was used up and the Park
District was out of funds. The park commissioners asked the voters to renew
the levy for three more years and they did by a 68% majority. Township
Trustees, Ethel Winterhalter, Russell Watkins, and Robert Reed, still hadn't
passed the amendments to the zoning laws allowing density zoning and a
debate began to grow in intensity. Over the next couple of years, the pros
and cons were voiced in the newspapers and in open meetings held by the park
commissioners.
In November, 1963, Township Trustee Ethel Winterhalter
expressed her thoughts on the amendments in the Kettering-Oakwood Times.
Ethel, a graduate of Ohio State University, owned and farmed 110 acres on
Lebanon Pike, south of Centerville. Her parents had purchased the land,
which included the old Samuel Broadaway house, in 1914. When they died in
1948, Ethel took over the farm, joined the Grange and became an active
resident of the community. She was a township trustee for twelve years. She
said she had experienced local government mismanaging the development of the
community as it grew and didn't want that to happen to Washington Township.
An open space advocate, she believed that development didn't have to be
detrimental to the land and wanted to be thorough and cautious with this new
amendment. She admired the "homegrown" Activity Center and the volunteers
that worked together to create it.
In the article, Ethel said she
didn't see a need for a whole series of playgrounds in the township. She
felt that playgrounds and playfields should be developed with the schools,
which would keep from duplicating services and facilities, and would also
keep the noisy playfields away from houses. She felt that the township
needed large parks that the whole family could enjoy and that small
playgrounds away from home was just a place to "farm kids out." Houses
should be built on large enough lots so the kids could play in their own
yard. In addition, Ethel objected to the way the park commissioners turned
down good park sites, like the one by Weller school, and also, that they
used the park levy money to bring condemnation action at the Mark-Dale Rd.
site.
Other concerns voiced by residents and officials were:
- the township should have a comprehensive land-use master plan and
all amendments should be held until that is complete. In a suburban area
with open farmland and no development plan, these amendments could only
create chaos, distrust, and uncertainty.
- will density zoning stand up in court?
- will density zoning be an incentive for developers to slice off some
for a park and then try to rezone creating even smaller lots?
- who would decide how much money should be paid by the developer so
the Park District could acquire an equivalent lot for a park?
- will these amendments open the township up to "graft" if one person
or a small group of persons holds the power to decide how much money the
township can accept from a builder?
- if township trustees rezone the land do they have the power to give
this money to the Park District for the purchase of park land since park
commissioners and trustees are not connected or responsible to each
other?
- should so much power be in the hands of just a few?
- will smaller sized homes encourage development of cheaper homes?
- maintaining all these parks will continually cost more and more
money.
- why do we need to worry, this land will always be farm land?
The park commissioners organized many public
meetings to answer questions, resolve concerns and
fears, and iron out the issues that were raised.
They were intent on trying to find a path between
the builders who prefer small lots and more houses,
and the citizens who oppose plat development
altogether.
Bill Yeck said that there was a
time, not too many years ago, when he stood up and
argued for zoning that required large lots. He felt
that half-acre lots was the way to insure "gracious
country living." He said he had changed his mind,
although the goal is the same. "Conditions have
changed, we are going through a period of
compromise. There are still places for large
estate-sized lots, but there are areas that are
going to be developed without any appreciable green
space."
He explained that the purpose of the
amendments was to encourage improved use of land in
Washington Township, which included reserving land
for open spaces, while providing additional ways to
control population density. The township demands for
large lot sizes and the restrictive zoning laws
tended to encourage builders to get their property
annexed into other municipalities where zoning is
less stringent. Annexation of more than 2300 acres
to Centerville and Kettering was blamed directly on
the township's stiff zoning. Density zoning would
preserve township zoning principles and the
character of the community and keep the township
intact.
In his presentations, Bill Yeck said
that proper development is always a top priority,
where everything is designed to be an asset. The
Park District has always advocated coordinating with
the schools to share cost and space. He answered
that the land next to Weller School was too small
and not appropriate for a playground. And he said
those opposed to the condemnation proceedings for
the the Mark-Dale Rd. site should review the facts.
He said that plenty of times the commission thought
about taking the easy way out, but that wouldn't
have given the kids a place to play.
The park
commissioners were committed to the promise of the
Park District and knew that this was an issue that
all were watching. Centerville and Washington
Township were in a position to lead the way and
demonstrate how the cooperation of all public
officials in a community and the land developers can
result in a park system that will benefit both
community and developer, and at minimum investment
by all groups. "We have an opportunity to establish
a great open space community and density zoning is a
means to accomplish it."
Builder Joseph
Rengers said he was for the amendments as a
developer. He said the concept of density zoning fit
in with homeowners' and prospective buyer's approach
to land.
Dale Bertsch of the Miami Valley
Regional Planning Commission responded to the
concern about a master plan and said yes, the
township did need one, but they have to start
somewhere and this is the place. Open space does not
wait.
Centerville resident Erma Bombeck,
wrote about the issue in "Zone 59," a column she
wrote for the Kettering-Oakwood Times. In the May 7,
1964 issue she said, "If you've never shaken hands
with a challenge before, it might inspire you to
shake hands with Mr. Yeck, Mr. Burkhart and Mr.
George who are working to bring a play area within a
half mile of every child in Washington Twp."
In August 1964, a committee was formed to officially
construct the amendments. The committee included
Robert L. Reed, township trustee, Charles Abramovitz,
an engineer with the Ralph L. Woolpert Company,
Robert Easton, a member of the Township Zoning
Commission, and Bill Yeck, chairman of the park
commission. In a last public meeting, on February
18, 1965, the amendments were presented along with a
detailed slide show, by Bill Yeck, of what the
amendments would mean to the township. Most of the
group attending were for the amendments. Finally,
the trustees indicated that they would pass the
amendments, but wanted to put it off to work out
some imprecise wording and do a little minor
rephrasing.
In a special Saturday morning
session on February 20, 1965, township trustees
Ethel Winterhalter, Russell Watkins, and Robert Reed
approved the new density zoning amendments to the
zoning ordinance. The amendments allowed the density
zoning provision that would permit developers of
single-family units to reduce lot sizes and transfer
the accumulated space to a public park area. They
also allowed a variety of development in a project
of 20 acres or more while utilizing the density
zoning provision and would allow the establishment
of privately maintained recreation areas under a
homeowners' association.
Evelyn List, zoning
inspector said that she had been in disagreement
with the park commissioners but had a change of
heart. She said she was for it now, has put a lot of
study into it, and is going to talk to some builders
who want to take 41 acres into Kettering. "I want to
have something to show them."
B.E. Clark,
Montgomery County Planning Director said that the
amendments will enable developers to add variety to
their projects.
Harold Freiheit, director of
Montgomery and Greene Counties Open Space Study
Committee, said the results of this plan may be
implemented in the whole county. It is a pilot plan
that Montgomery County is waiting for, and will pave
the way for this type of zoning throughout other
townships.
These amendments were full of a
promise to make Washington Township a great Open
Space Community by allowing new homeowners to set
aside school and park sites for their use without
cost to present tax payers. It was a good precedent
and the Centerville-Washington Park District was on
its way. With the vision of the 1950s and with the
30 circles on the original plan map where
neighborhoods would be developed and parks needed,
it all fell into place.
The rest of the story
is told through the individual parks as each one
developed, as the Park District kept its promise of
1959 to the residents of Centerville and Washington
Township.
The Commissioners, Staff, and
Volunteers
Park Commissioners - In the early days before there
was a staff, the commissioners had a large role in land
acquisition and daily operations. Once the Park District
started hiring, less and less duties and
responsibilities fell to the commissioners. Today their
responsibilities are in setting policy for the Park
District and approving and monitoring the budget. And
they are active in the levy campaigns. The commissioners
are appointed by the Court of Common Pleas and serve
3-year terms, all without pay. Each year one
commissioner is up for re-appointment and they have term
limits of 9 years.
Bill Yeck, of course,
continued to work behind the scenes with land
acquisition and the development of parkland. Rev. Harvey
Smith was on the board for 23 years, many of them as
president. He worked closely with Bill and continues to
volunteer work on the levies.
Staff - In the
beginning, taking care of the parks was an informal
process and there were always volunteers willing and
able to work. In 1965, Larry Marker was hired as a
temporary park director. Mary Jo Zoller was hired as
part-time secretary and worked for the district until
1994. In 1966, as the number of parks grew, Russell
Miller was hired as a part-time director and engineer at
$2.75 an hour. In 1967, Richard E. Haley, and his
tractor, was hired as a part-time maintenance chief. He
worked evenings and on weekends and he was paid $2.50 an
hour. If he used his chain saw, a $1.50 an hour was
added to his pay. If he needed his pickup truck he was
paid 10 cents a mile. Gene E. Cronk was hired as a
part-time engineer in 1968.
By the early 1970s,
it was clear that part-time help and rented equipment
could not handle the job. In 1971, Jack W. Whitesell was
hired as special projects supervisor. In 1974, 2 chain
saws, a pick up truck, 2 tractors and a rotary mower
were purchased. In 1975, the Park District built an
operations building at the Activity Center. Ed Kramer
was hired as a part-time naturalist in 1978 and Brett
Ney was added as a mowing supervisor.
In 1975,
James A. Schneider was hired as full time park
manager/director. He left in 1982 and the Park District
was without a director until 1991 when Rick Tittsler was
hired. Carol Kennard, who had been program manager since
1982, was hired as the third director in 1998.
In
1974, Robert F. Feldmann was hired as superintendent.
Throughout the years, his job evolved as duties were
added. In 2008, his title was changed to development
manager, which better reflected his responsibilities.
As park development increased, so did the level of care
for the parks. The operations department grew to meet
the demand, including the addition of a second shift and
weekend crew during the busy months.
The Park District had
originally supported the concept of youth baseball,
football, and soccer leagues operated by citizens
organizations without Park District supervision. But in
the 1980s things were pushing for a change. Carol
Kennard was hired as the first full-time program
coordinator in 1982. She initiated a comprehensive
programs of sports instruction, tournaments and leagues
for youth and adults, summer recreation programs for
children, and nature programs in Grant Park and Sugar
Valley Park (now Bill Yeck Park).
Over the next
several years, many staff contributed to the success of
the programs and the program department grew to four
full-time staff. Office management became a priority as
programs increased. In time a full-charge bookkeeper,
communications coordinator, and business manager filled
the office staff requirements.
From 1970 to 1994 the building and
grounds design was provided by Joseph F. Hirsch,
architect and landscape designer.
Volunteers -
When Carol Kennard came on staff as program director,
she started a volunteer naturalist program which is
still going strong today. Those adult volunteers provide
nature programs in the parks. Youth volunteers help with
Hidden Meadows Day Camp and the Summer Rec Program in
the summer and Winter Woods Day Camp in the winter.
These are kids that have outgrown the program but aren't
quite old enough to work.
The largest volunteer
group in the parks is the youth athletic leagues, which
are entirely run by volunteers - league administrators,
coaches, and the officials. The Park District provides
the field space, coordinates schedules and maintains the
athletic fields.
Each year the Park Districts
works with 10 to 15 Boy Scouts and Girls Scouts who do
projects in the parks to earn their Eagle Rank and Gold
Awards.
And service projects, like litter sweeps
or cutting back honeysuckle from the trails, are done by
special request from various groups. The Park District
is more than happy to have their help.
|

|